Monday, May 23, 2016

Three makes a business: Conclusion


 

 


Conclusion



Let's look back at the questions we proposed in the introduction.

What actually is a business?
How does it come to be?
What purpose does a business have?
What purpose does it serve?
What kind of people make up a business?
What makes a good employee?
What makes a bad one?
What kind of people become customers?
What makes a good business?
Why do some go under?

We can now provide the answers:

A business is a money processing entity. The goal of a business is continued existence. It grazes for a specific type of money that grows on land consisting of a specific type of customer. It's internal structure is defined by the kind of money it is adapted to.It is created by the evolutionary niche it fills. The effects of processing this money are products and a lighter pocket of the customer.

Employees are hired and fired based on their attitude, effect and social aptitude. In most businesses you will find combinations of all the possible values of these three characteristics in its employees. In theory you can distinguish between good and bad employees. In many businesses and for many positions people are hired and fired based upon subjective notions (in the absence of tangible production).

People become customers out of want or need. They become our customers depending on our choices for advertising, treatment and product quality. Our decisions are guided by the available competition.

Three makes a business. The choice of grazing lands, the inner workings of the company and the approach of the customer are the key areas when it comes to conducting business. A good business plan is based on a study of these three areas. Companies that go under fail in one or more.


With this knowlegde we can understand our lives better as customers and employees. Our powers and vulnerabilities. We know what a business wants from us and what we can get out of it. For the business owner the areas that require attention are laid bare.

Now it is up to you to restart the renewed battle for survival.

Three makes a business: Succes or failure

 

 

 

 

 


Good business versus failed business


A business is an entity that seeks out and processes the money of the customer via the labor of the employee. The effect is the product. The only purpose of a business is to exist.

So what makes a good business and why do some go under? It all comes down to the decisions of higher management. They are responsible for the following:

The selection of grazing lands. If people are no longer demanding phone lines, a telecom company can either die or choose to diversify. For instance by providing multimedia products and mobile connections.

The inner workings of the company. Health is important for the brain, the nervous system and the individual cells. If you have excellent workers but can't get orders down to them, your operations cease. Individuals that provide the desired effect have to be selected and maintained.
Material management, facility management and logistics are an important part of the innerworkings as well. If you pay too much for raw materials and can't get the product out in time your company might fail.

The approach of the customer. As higher management you have to accurately determine what type of product you want to sell to which type of customer under what kind of conditions. A famous example is VHS versus Beta-max. You can have an excellent product, and be very proud of it indeed, but if you fail to convince the customer, you loose.

A good company succeeds in these three areas. A bad one fails in one or more.

Next chapter: Conclusion

Three makes a business: The customer

 

 

 

 

 

 


What kind of people become customers?


Let's first give a definition of the customer and the product. If we continue to use the metaphor of the company as a cow: customers are people that are after a company's dung and in the pursuit of which get their grass cut. Of course this is not very flattering. Here is a more neutral version.

The customer: a person that purchases a product.
The product: a service or object produced by a company intended for sale.

These are very clean definitions. However they just focus on the physical action. Let's take a closer look at what a customer actually is.
Every employee generates manpower. Or better said: working hours. The effect of these working hours is a product. In exchange for the effort, money is given to the worker. A resource that can be exchanged for any other kind of resource. When buying a product, the customer exchanges his or her working hours for those of someone else, swapping the products he produces for products of his choice, essentially having produced these himself. In effect the customer is the agent who decides on what manpower is spent. A company just stores products temporarily while handing out money to employees. It again receives money when a customer buys the product. It also provides the working space.
The net result of all this would be zero. In reality, there is the market place. I will make no attempt to explain its complexities in this text. For this text it was enough to make the point of what a customer really is, and what essentially happens in a purchase.


Different types


Now we know what a customer is, we can look at the different types of customer. When hungry, we buy bread. When we got the money, we buy a fancy car. There are two types of customer:

The willing customer: a person motivated by want.
The unwilling customer: a person motivated by need.

Note, need always supersedes want. For example, let me provide you with either drugs or bread. Which gets bought? Want is a subjective term. I might judge you to want drugs and need bread. You might need the drugs and opt to forgo the bread.
Of course you might think of many more types of customer. Happy, sad, enthusiastic, disinterested, loyal, disloyal, incidental, habitual, etc. In this text making the essential difference is enough. When we buy a product the chief actor is need or want. Other characteristics such as behavioral, psychological or socio-economic characteristics merely impact on need and want. All customers and companies can be classified by just these two (a company might produce bread, or fancy cars).


Getting the customer


So how do we get the customer to become our customer? And once they bought our product, how do we keep them loyal?


Advertising

Well we first have to communicate existence of our product. We can do this in two ways:

Honestly: it exists. You can buy it. It does this and that.
Dishonestly: let us lure you in. Our world is wonderful. We give amazing purchase value. We will tell you with a smile that it does this, that and more... so much better than anything out there. But really it doesn't.


Advertising has the greatest effect on the first purchase. Once a customer knows the product, the effects diminish. Of course if the customer is happy with the product, advertizing for a new product can have great effect.
Depending on customer psychology, market and product, advertizers choose a mix of both reality and fantasy based elements.


Treatment

Secondly, we treat the customer a certain way. There are two extremes for this continuum. They are the same for what we do and how the customer perceives it.

Good treatment: the customer experiences treatment matching or exceeding his standards.
Bad treatment: the customer experiences treatment below his standards.

Treament of course has impact on each individual purchase. However the effect is most felt in the area of customer loyalty. Very bad treatment might scare customers away from even the initial purchase. However if your company treats people allright, but the competition treats them great, you will still loose business. Treatment is also influenced by the type of customer. Whether a person needs or wants something, makes a great difference.


Product

Then there is the product. In recent times it has seemed that the actual product matters less than the customers perception of the product and the company. Take Apple versus the rest. Samsung, LG, Sony, they all wish their customers could have the same experience with their products as Apple customers. It has been argued.. that the products are virtually indentical in their capabilities and production costs. Perhaps Apple customers just prefer the beautiful and seductive fantasy created by the Apple company above the more mundane experience provided by it's competition. However, it still matters if your product works as advertised, or not. If Apple were to produce a defective ipod, their customer base would shrink.

There are two basic types of product:

The single purchase
The service

These are the extreme ends of a continuum. Bread for instance is per unit a single purchase but  a service when customers go back to the same bakery each time.

There are two classifications for any product:

A product based on need
A product based on want

There is one intrinsic characteristic of any product: the continuum called quality. The product works as needed or it doesn't, or somewhere in between.

Based on the kind of product we sell and customer we want to sell it too, we can make a choice for the quality we offer.


Means versus waste product

Do note that in this text we state that products can be seen as the waste products of an organism like a cow. You could instead state that products are the means by which companies collect money. Like the mouth of a cow. Products enable the company to graze money.. Perhaps there is merit to both metaphors. However, if you look at what happens to money in a company and why people buy products the original metaphor of this text holds up.
Money is processed into usable materials for the company in the same way an organism processes food. It becomes infrastructure, real estate, salaries, bloodvessels and cells. And after all usable materials are collected from the food, the unwanted materials are pushed out, which are helpfull to generating more grass, but can not sustain it since more is taken than delivered. Grass grows because of sunshine and materials in the earth. Eventually grass exhausts the land it resides on. Usually rivers etc. prevent this by carrying sediment down hill. The same goes for the customer, it's not sustained by the product, the product only helps it a bit. Most of it's materials are delivered by other means (income stream).
Products tempt the customer to give money to the company. It's the temptation (advertising -which includes the product being on the shelve-, treatment, etc.) that is the mechanism by which it is collected. This is the mouth. Only after collection and processing a product is delivered. The company's adaptation to its environment includes the mouth, the way it sells (collects grass).
Now you can say: Well hey, for most companies, you receive the product immediately after buying. But this is just a temporal paradox. It's a little like the company already produced dung from the money it has yet to receive. More exactly, it's the dung from the previous money of the previous customer. For some companies like a custom furniture company, the metaphor of the cow holds up even in the temporal sense.


Competition

There is one more factor that decides whether people become our customer. The available choice. Our own decisions on advertising, treatment and quality are directly impacted by the competition, or lack there of. Location is a good example. If people have to travel too far too reach your business, they will opt for the competition. This referred to as a local monopoly.


Company policy


When we leave out morals and law, the choice businesses make for how they advertise, make products and treat customers depends on the type of product, the type of customer and the position in the market. Let's look at a few examples.

For simplicity, we disregard other factors in each example.

Two types of customer: need versus want. Grocery story versus jewelery story. A jewelry store has to tempt the customer to buy, a grocery store only has to be there. People will buy food no matter what. There is no need to lie about the product. There is no need for quality and good treatment either.

Two types of product: single purchase versus service. Car company versus telecom company. The financial risk of lying is higher for the telecom company than for the car company. The latter only has to convince the customer once. The same goes for quality. As long as the customer believes he is making a good purchase, it doesn't matter if the fuel economy is actually lousy. As for treatment, the car company only has to treat the customer well once. After that, calls can be ignored.

Two possible market positions: monopoly versus competition. General Electric versus Apple. The need for effective advertising is high if people have plenty of choice. The same goes for quality and treatment. Apple has plenty of competitors to worry about. It needs to excell in all areas. If you are the only one who can make certain types of industrial generators, you can afford to make different choices.


So when do people become customers?


People become customers out of want or need. They become our customers depending on our choices for advertising, treatment and product quality. A great influence on our choices is the available competition.

So what makes a good business? Let's explore this subject in our last text.

Next chapter: Succes or failure

Three makes a business: The employee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


What kind of people make up a business?


Let's take the cow again as a metaphor. The actions of a cow are directed by it's brain. The brain communicates these actions via the nervous system to the cells.

Leaders: people that make the plans what the cow should do in order to survive and grow. They are the brains of the company. They decide on the what and when.
Communicators: people that communicate the orders of the brain down to the cells, and the reactions of the cells back up to the brain. They are the nervous system of the company.
Workers: they are the guts, bones and muscles of the company. They process the food, move the body around and carry it's weight. They give off signals of compliance, content and malcontent to the nervous system.

Of course things are a little more complex, both in nature and in business. A body consists of various organs and other cell groups with specific functions. There are muscles, kidneys, lungs and the heart. In companies these individual parts often have a similar structure to the whole, consisting of a local brain, with local communicators and local workers.

Commonly in business the different groups of people are named thus:

Higher management: central leadership. one way outgoing communication.
Management: local leadership. two way outgoing communication.
Employees: workers. one way outgoing communication.

So now we are done with talking about the people that make up a business. Right? Well... not quite. There are more characteristics yet unrevealed.  We can discover these via some additional questions:

What are good people to have?
Whom can you do better without?


Good people, common people and bad people


Let's look at the people first. There are many character types and traits, depending on which psychology book you happen to open. What kind of traits are important for a business? For which positions? Leadership, endurance, foresight, loyalty, self reliance, team-player...?
I won't attempt to echo any business school psychology texts working out detailed descriptions for each possible kind of position. Instead let's keep things simple. People make a certain contribution to the company. They do this with a certain attitude towards the work in a social enviroment. Thus there are three factors when it comes to employees. There is attitude, effect and social aptitude. There are three basic types of employees for each.

Effect
Future makers. These are the people that help the company to increase in value.
Steady rollers. These people maintain the value of the company. They keep it shipshape.
Failures. People that decrease the value of the company. They harm production and morale.

Attitude
Progressive people. These are people with idea's. They put in more effort than is required. They care about advancing the company.
9 to 5 people. People that put in the required effort, but no more. They do not volunteer idea's. The company is just a job to them, in order to eat and pay for housing.
Slackers. These are the people that do not care about the company. They put in minimal effort, if possible below requirement.

Social aptitude
High. People that are well liked and well connected. Often able to acquire positions well above ability. They often end higher than where they started.
Medium. People that are just part of the group. They get along fine with everyone. They progress at a steady pace through the hierarchy of the company, often settling just a few positions above where they started.
Low. These people lack the ability to present themselves well and connect with people. Or they just don't care. Often they are disliked and shunned. They could be either anti social loners or just awkward. Often these reside in their starting position forever.

Combinations
In each employee there can be any combination of these three characteristics. Do note, attitude and effect are not the same thing. A person with a thousand idea's that loves the company is not necessarily a future maker. Lets look at some combination examples.
-You can have a future maker who is a slacker and a loner. A brilliant scientist that is often absent and disliked. Could not care less about the company. Still when available this persons minimal efforts provide the company with the greatest new products.
-You could have a steady roller that is a progressive. Sadly the idea's provided are not worth much. Still the work done on maintaining the company is well worth the pay.
-Then you might see a failure, who just puts in the hours from 9:00-17:00. However with a very high social aptitude this person is able to convince everyone the job is important and gets done very well indeed.


Hiring and firing


Personnel gets hired and fired based on these three characteristics. Attitude is judged in the interview, and effect is judged from previous employment. Attitude replaces effect if there was no previous employment, or the effect of which can't be judged.
Social aptitude is often not judged consciously as a trait. Interviewers and managers are people, and often they just experience the other person, liking or disliking him or her. However this trait is at least as important as the others for getting hired or fired. It decides the favorableness or harshness of the judgment on the other two. Bad attitude and failure can gradually wear down the effect of high social aptitude during employment.
When it comes to firing, effect and social aptitude ofter matter more than attitude. This is because higher management often favors productivity above attitude. Futheremore, like and dislike are important factors in the willingness of a boss to fire you


So who gets to work where? 


When it comes to higher management, management and employees, which variants are most represented where? You might be tempted to give a quick logical analysis. If you were an employee you could tell me higher management would of course be full of people with high social aptitude. Not necessarily skillful ones. If you are in higher management you could judge that employees are mostly steady rollers, with a 9 to 5 attitude.
If you ask me, well, i simply don't know. I have no figures, only logic and observation. The chances of getting hired for higher management depends a lot on your social aptitude. But the same goes for the position of common employee. The interviewer has to like you. Being effective is as important for keeping your job as employee as it is for a manager. Then there is this: you can only hire and fire the people that are there. Some companies have the luxury of being able to pick out the raisins from the porridge. Other just have to select all kinds. It is likely the different types of people enter, work in and leave a company equally spread over all levels.
This estimate is quite apart from any attitudes the lazy 9 to 5 worker bees might have towards the soulless incompetent management.
There is no need to look in detail at why people become employees, since this can be directly mapped on the needs, wants, attitudes and aptitudes of people and companies.

Now we can take a look at the customers. After that we could analyse what makes a good business and why some go under.

Next chapter: The customer

Three makes a business: The definition of a business


 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The definition of a business



Lets start with the how and the why. If we know how something is formed and why, perhaps we can more easily answer what it is. Directly focusing on the what might get us blinded by the many parts a business consists off.


How a business comes to be


Suppose there is no electronic telecommunication. We have to send letters or travel in order to communicate. Suddenly someone genius invents the phone. A very handy device. Instead of sending letters people can now connect instantly. In the area of communication phone service is usefull for everybody. A social demand emerges. So another genius starts a business. Why? To provide a livelihood for himself. Out of demand one can make money. It's such a good idea that many people join the business as employees for the same goal. They want bread on the table, and telecom seems a good way to do it. The emergent organization quickly becomes an established one. With a management structure and a product delivery structure it provides the public with what they want and thus its members with a livelihood.



The purpose of a business


Since a business consists of individual people, that gather and work as a collective to provide people outside the organization with a product, we can detect three separate purposes:

Individual purpose: to provide a livelihood.
Collective purpose: the continued existence of the organization.
Social purpose: to provide service X in area Y for customer Z.

I have already taken the liberty of defining these purposes. The definition of the first purpose seems clear. We all need to eat. The second and third do not. To the casual observer the social purpose is also the collective purpose. Businesses exists to provide products, do they not? So let's ask some more questions and see if these early definitions hold up.


Does a business have a collective purpose?
seperate from the social purpose?
seperate from what it produces, from what it does?

Is there even such a thing as a collective when it comes to people working in a business?
is a business more than the sum of its parts?
is there an emergent entity? 
or are we just a bunch of individuals doing our thing that happen to gather in the same place?


Entity or individuals
Any organization is an entity apart from the individual blocks that form it. It emerges out of the combination. This is what organization does. There are individual parts that might do one or more things. Lamps provide light. Windows provide protection against weather. Seats provide comfortable storage of people. Wheels provide mechanical transport. If you connect these individual parts, a new entity emergences: the car.
A car is not a window based product, a lamp housing, or a wheel extension. None of the individual parts can do what a car can, yet together they are something new, an entity that has its own separate existence.

Goal: existence or product
The goal of an entity in the telecom world seems clear. To provide telecom service. A product. However is this what they are really after? Perhaps they are after the customers money? A livelihood? Maybe the product is just an effect of this desire..

Let's look at nature for guidance. Grass appears as the result of evolution. A cow comes along and starts eating it. What is the purpose of the cow? Does it come there specifically to make sure it doesn't grow to long? Does it come to fertilize? No. The cow comes because it its hungry. It isn't at all concerned with any purpose related to grass. It wants to eat. It wants to live. That is it's purpose. By effect it does provide a service in the world, cutting grass and fertilization via dumping dung. However the cow itself does not have this purpose. The services provided are merely the effect of a hungry cow.

The cow itself of course is also a result of evolution. A being adapted to eat grass. So there is a cause and effect relation to grass and cows. Because there is grass, there is evolutionary room to evolve a being that can exploit this resource. So the nature of a cow is directly related to the nature and existence of the grass. It's a grass processing facility.

The mistake often made is this: to either confuse nature with purpose, or effect with purpose. The purpose that a cow strives for is to survive. Not to process grass. Not to cut grass or dump dung. The nature of a cow is a grass processing facility. By processing grass, it survives. The effect of this effort to survive is cut grass and dung. This happens to have a social function for the environment the cow lives in. It is without intent, but it is still there.

So the goal of a business is not to provide a service. It is to survive. To exist. As a result of this desire, it seeks out grazing lands, processes grass and provides a service to these lands. Via evolution a business is the result of adaptation to the grazing lands that are there. 


The stated purposes hold up. Now we know how and why businesses come to exist. We can now proceed to the definition.


What is a business?


Let's break down what a business is with telecom as an example using the metaphor of the cow.

There is land. For a business land consists of people. But not just any people, customers. People that want products in a specific area. In this case the area of telecom. So the land a telecom company can graze on is customers that want telecommunication.

There is grass. The land consisting of customers interested in telecommunication is fertile ground for a specific type of grass. Telecom money. The money people are willing to spend on telecommunication.

There is a cow. In the land consisting of customers interested in telecommunication products, the type of cow that can harvest the telecom money that grows there, is the telecom company. A fruit company can't digest telecom money.

There is dung. The telecom money that grows on the land consisting of customers interested in telecommunication products is cut by the telecom company, processed in it's stomach, and after extracting vital nutrients (salaries), the byproduct is returned to the land. These are the telecom services.

So now we can define a business. The definition becomes as follows:

A business is a money processing entity. The goal is existence.
It grazes for a specific type of money that grows on land consisting of a specific type of customer. It's internal structure is defined by the kind of money it is adapted to. The effects of processing are products and a lighter pocket of the customer.

Next chapter: The employee

Three makes a business: Introduction



Introduction


A business. The workplace. A social gathering with a purpose. A place where things get done. People and materials are moved around and money is exchanged. Everyday some kind of a result is achieved. We all go there. Either as customer or as employee. Not a thought spend on it. So let's do just that.

What actually is a business?
How does it come to be?
What purpose does a business have?
What purpose does it serve?
What kind of people make up a business?
What makes a good employee?
What makes a bad one?
What kind of people become customers?
What makes a good business?
Why do some go under?

Let's see if we can answer these questions one by one and enhance our understanding of a business. In the next text we will focus on the definition of a business. From there we can explore the employee, the customer and finally list the factors important for an effective business.

Next chapter: The definition of a business